nanog mailing list archives

Re: Whois 172/12

From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:05:17 +0530

Jesus. 172.16/12 fine .. that's rfc1918.   The rest of 172/8 is mostly
unallocated.

On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> wrote:

Read RFC1918.

Likely a machine on his local network (i.e. behind the same NAT box) is hitting him.

But that is not guaranteed.  A packet with a source address of 172.0.x.x




-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)

Current thread:

Whois 172/12 Ted Fischer (Jan 14)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Alex Ryu (Jan 14)
  - Re: Whois 172/12 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 14)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Ted Fischer (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Jeroen Massar (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Jimmy Hess (Jan 15)
    - RE: Whois 172/12 Keith Medcalf (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Justin M. Streiner (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 15)
    - RE: Whois 172/12 Network IP Dog (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Tom Hill (Jan 19)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Robert Bonomi (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 bmanning (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Jon Lewis (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Jay Moran (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 15)
    - Message not available
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Alex Ryu (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Leigh Porter (Jan 15)