nanog mailing list archives

Re: Whois 172/12

From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 09:46:41 -0500

On Jan 15, 2012, at 7:36 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:

 I'v read RFC-1918.   I cannot find *any* reference to  172.0/12, as the OP
was asking about.  172.16/12, yes. but not 172.0/12.  Can you please clarify
your advice?


My advice is not to post when you are tired. :)

-- 
TTFN,
patrick

Current thread:

RE: Whois 172/12, (continued)
- - - RE: Whois 172/12 Keith Medcalf (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Justin M. Streiner (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 15)
    - RE: Whois 172/12 Network IP Dog (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Tom Hill (Jan 19)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Robert Bonomi (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 bmanning (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Jon Lewis (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Jay Moran (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 15)
    - Message not available
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Alex Ryu (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Leigh Porter (Jan 15)