nanog mailing list archives

Re: Whois 172/12

From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 06:36:12 -0600 (CST)

From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi.com () nanog org  Sun Jan 15 02:02:00 2012
Subject: Re: Whois 172/12
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 02:58:11 -0500
To: NANOG list <nanog () nanog org>

Read RFC1918.

Likely a machine on his local network (i.e. behind the same NAT box) is hitting him.



Patrick,
  I'v read RFC-1918.   I cannot find *any* reference to  172.0/12, as the OP
was asking about.  172.16/12, yes. but not 172.0/12.  Can you please clarify
your advice?

ZZ

Current thread:

Re: Whois 172/12, (continued)
- - Re: Whois 172/12 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 14)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Ted Fischer (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Jeroen Massar (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Jimmy Hess (Jan 15)
    - RE: Whois 172/12 Keith Medcalf (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Justin M. Streiner (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 15)
    - RE: Whois 172/12 Network IP Dog (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Tom Hill (Jan 19)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Robert Bonomi (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 bmanning (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Jon Lewis (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Jay Moran (Jan 15)
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 15)
    - Message not available
    - Re: Whois 172/12 Alex Ryu (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Leigh Porter (Jan 15)