Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

On May 25, 2011, at 11:12 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:

> On May 26, 2011, at 7:35 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> > >
> >
> > Unfortunately, the FCC hasn't really allowed us to since it would be very
> > hard to produce useful bandwidth by today's standards within the bounds
> > of the spectrum we are allowed to use and the channel separations we
> > are allowed to use.
>
> You just need to move up in frequency a bit. My slowest ham-band link runs at 12 Mbps and my fastest at over 100 Mbps.

Re: 100Mbps...

Yeah, for a modern household LAN, you're at about 1/3rd my minimum bandwidth and 1/10th my current maximum.

For wide area purposes, you're at about 1/100th of the smallest circuits we're running in the modern backbone.

> Good reminder that I should renumber the IPv4 portion of that network to somewhere in 44.0.0.0/8 however.

Yeah, not a bad idea. Wonder if we can get a /32 for AMPR from IETF since it would be prohibitively expensive to
get it from an RIR.

Owen