Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)

[Carl Rosevear <crosevear () skytap com>]

Used to run IP over AX.25 using KA9Q JNOS back in the day.  HF at 300
baud simplex / half-duplex and VHF 144 Mhz at 1200 with similar
characteristics.  I bought some 9600 baud gear at one point but never
got it all put together before moving on to the regular internet and
(somewhat unfortunately) not really looking back.  I remember
transferring some uuencoded gifs via smtp...  a couple of days later,
if you were lucky, it would complete.  I learned about how protocols
communicate watching packet traces in KA9Q JNOS when I was about 14
years old.  It was really easy when there were guaranteed to be
multiple seconds between packets.  I remember being 14 and feeling
pretty suave when I figured out how to telnet into an SMTP server to
send mail...  of course that is old hat but still good common
troubleshooting these days!


de KB7LIG

--Carl


On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Jack Carrozzo <jack () crepinc com> wrote:
> Me personally? No, but I have used it. IP over 9600baud serial actually
> isn't that bad for IRC when you're in the middle of the woods and all.
>
> You want slow... read about winlink2000, the email/messaging system for hams
> and emergency response. It's PSK on HF, meant to be reliable but if you get
> more than 400bps you are doing GREAT! It's so slow that you can run the
> software on two laptops using the sound cards, and they'll talk across the
> room via speakers and mics no problem. It sounds kinda like robots rapping.
>
> -Jack Carrozzo
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Christopher Pilkington <cjp () 0x1 net>wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Jack Carrozzo <jack () crepinc com> wrote:
> > > Nope, mostly HF (under 30mhz) gear at 300baud. Yes, you read that right.
> >
> > You are running IP on this?  And I though 1200 bauds half duplex was slow.



-- 
Carl Rosevear
Manager of Operations
Skytap, Inc.
direct (206) 588-8899