Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space

[Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com>]

> From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi.com () nanog org  Wed May 25 13:44:21 2011
> Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 14:43:24 -0400
> Subject: Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space
> From: Christopher Pilkington <cjp () 0x1 net>
> To: Michael Dillon <wavetossed () googlemail com>
> Cc: NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Michael Dillon
> <wavetossed () googlemail com> wrote:
> > So we should CONDONE such borrowing and recommend a couple of /8s to
> > use in North America. Perhaps one could be DOD for those operators
> > that do not carry any DOD traffic and one could be that /8 from
> > Softbank Japan, 126/8 if I recall it correctly. People who carry DOD
> > traffic could borrow the APNIC block.
>
> I recommend 44/8.  Does it make sense that ham radio operators have
> routable IP address space any longer?  (Seems to be still advertised,
> though.)

Still advertised, still in (light, limited) use.