nanog mailing list archives

Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP

From: Aaron Glenn <aaron.glenn () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:58:08 -0500

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Scott Reed <sreed () nwwnet net> wrote:

Public or not, if someone wants to run IPv6 only, they shouldn't have to
have the v4 stack just for the database.  Databases must work on the v6
stack.


amen. so isn't that a dba issue and not a netop issue? I subscribe to
postgresql-* lists for my dba fill (:

Current thread:

ipv6 vs. LAMP Christopher McCrory (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Majdi S. Abbas (Oct 21)
  - Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Joel Jaeggli (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Jack Bates (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Leo Bicknell (Oct 21)
  - Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Dan White (Oct 21)
    - Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Brandon Galbraith (Oct 21)
    - Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Joel Jaeggli (Oct 21)
    - Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Oct 22)
    - Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Scott Reed (Oct 22)
    - Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Aaron Glenn (Oct 22)
    - Message not available
    - Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Oct 23)