nanog mailing list archives

Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP


From: Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:59:52 -0500

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Dan White <dwhite () olp net> wrote:

On 21/10/10 14:43 -0700, Leo Bicknell wrote:

In a message written on Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 01:53:49PM -0700, Christopher
McCrory wrote:

open to the world.  After a few google searches, it seems that
PostgreSQL is in a similar situation.


I don't know when PostgreSQL first supported IPv6, but it works just
fine.  I just fired up a stock FreeBSD 8.1 system and built the Postgres
8.4 port with no changes, and viola:


All this is pretty moot point if you run a localized copy of your database
(mysql or postgres) and connect via unix domains sockets.


True. It mostly affects shared/smaller hosting providers who have customers
that want direct access to the database remotely over the public network
(and don't want to use some local admin tool such as phpMyAdmin).

-brandon

-- 
Brandon Galbraith
US Voice: 630.492.0464


Current thread: