nanog mailing list archives
Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP
From: Dan White <dwhite () olp net>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:53:00 -0500
On 21/10/10 14:43 -0700, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 01:53:49PM -0700, Christopher McCrory wrote:open to the world. After a few google searches, it seems that PostgreSQL is in a similar situation.I don't know when PostgreSQL first supported IPv6, but it works just fine. I just fired up a stock FreeBSD 8.1 system and built the Postgres 8.4 port with no changes, and viola:
All this is pretty moot point if you run a localized copy of your database (mysql or postgres) and connect via unix domains sockets. -- Dan White
Current thread:
- ipv6 vs. LAMP Christopher McCrory (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Majdi S. Abbas (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Joel Jaeggli (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Jack Bates (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Leo Bicknell (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Dan White (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Brandon Galbraith (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Joel Jaeggli (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Oct 22)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Scott Reed (Oct 22)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Aaron Glenn (Oct 22)
- Message not available
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Oct 23)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Dan White (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Majdi S. Abbas (Oct 21)