nanog mailing list archives
Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP
From: Scott Reed <sreed () nwwnet net>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:32:15 -0400
Public or not, if someone wants to run IPv6 only, they shouldn't have to have the v4 stack just for the database. Databases must work on the v6 stack.
On 10/22/2010 10:02 AM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
IMHO you should never, ever make your MySQL accesible over the public Internet, which renders the issue of MySQL not supporting IPv6 correctly mostly irrelevant. You could even run your MySQL behind your web backend using RFC1918 space (something I do recommend). Moreover, if you need direct access to the engine, you can trivially create an SSH tunnel (You can even do this in a point-and-click way using the latest MySQL Workbench). SSH works over IPv6 just fine. And for the LAMP stack, as long as the "A" fully supports IPv6 (which it does), we are fine. Warm regards, Carlos On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Joel Jaeggli<joelja () bogus com> wrote:On 10/21/10 2:59 PM, Brandon Galbraith wrote:On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Dan White<dwhite () olp net> wrote:On 21/10/10 14:43 -0700, Leo Bicknell wrote:In a message written on Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 01:53:49PM -0700,ChristopherMcCrory wrote:open to the world. After a few google searches, it seems that PostgreSQL is in a similar situation.I don't know when PostgreSQL first supported IPv6, but it works just fine. I just fired up a stock FreeBSD 8.1 system and built thePostgres8.4 port with no changes, and viola:All this is pretty moot point if you run a localized copy of yourdatabase(mysql or postgres) and connect via unix domains sockets.True. It mostly affects shared/smaller hosting providers who havecustomersthat want direct access to the database remotely over the public network (and don't want to use some local admin tool such as phpMyAdmin).linux/unix machines can trivially build ip-tunnels of several flavors.-brandon
-- Scott Reed Owner NewWays Networking, LLC Wireless Networking Network Design, Installation and Administration Mikrotik Advanced Certified www.nwwnet.net (765) 855-1060
Current thread:
- ipv6 vs. LAMP Christopher McCrory (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Majdi S. Abbas (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Joel Jaeggli (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Jack Bates (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Leo Bicknell (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Dan White (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Brandon Galbraith (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Joel Jaeggli (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Oct 22)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Scott Reed (Oct 22)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Aaron Glenn (Oct 22)
- Message not available
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Oct 23)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Dan White (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Majdi S. Abbas (Oct 21)