nanog mailing list archives
Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP
From: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa () latt net>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:00:39 -0700
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 01:53:49PM -0700, Christopher McCrory wrote:
Network operations content: Will "We're running MySQL and Postgress servers that do not support IPv6" be a valid reason for rejecting IPv6 addresses from ISPs or hosting providers?
First, it's not like the flag day is tomorrow. And then, I think if you're running SQL over the public Internet, you have bigger problems than whether or not you're going to be able to get v4 addressing and transit. --msa
Current thread:
- ipv6 vs. LAMP Christopher McCrory (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Majdi S. Abbas (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Joel Jaeggli (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Jack Bates (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Leo Bicknell (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Dan White (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Brandon Galbraith (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Joel Jaeggli (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Oct 22)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Scott Reed (Oct 22)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Aaron Glenn (Oct 22)
- Message not available
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Oct 23)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Dan White (Oct 21)
- Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP Majdi S. Abbas (Oct 21)