nanog mailing list archives
Re: DHS and NSA getting married?
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:08:59 -0400
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:50 AM, George Bonser <gbonser () seven com> wrote:
From: christopher.morrow () gmail com Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 8:05 AM To: George Bonser Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: DHS and NSA getting married? are any of the civilian agencies really prepared/capable of dealing with 'cyber attack'? it seems fairly natural that a 'cyber attack' (on the gov't, or it's pieces/parts) is equivalent to an 'attack' on same. We don't arm the NIST folks with Ar-15's and send them over the hill, we do that with marines. -chris"cyber attack" wasn't what caught my eye. It was the notion of NSA having a domestic role defined in policy that I thought was different here.
not all packets have source addresses in the US, not all facilities in the US Gov't cares about are in the Us.
Current thread:
- DHS and NSA getting married? George Bonser (Oct 21)
- Re: DHS and NSA getting married? Christopher Morrow (Oct 22)
- Re: DHS and NSA getting married? Steven Bellovin (Oct 22)
- Re: DHS and NSA getting married? Christopher Morrow (Oct 22)
- Re: DHS and NSA getting married? Marshall Eubanks (Oct 22)
- Re: DHS and NSA getting married? Matthew Palmer (Oct 22)
- Re: DHS and NSA getting married? Quinn Kuzmich (Oct 22)
- Re: DHS and NSA getting married? Steven Bellovin (Oct 22)
- Re: DHS and NSA getting married? Christopher Morrow (Oct 22)
- RE: DHS and NSA getting married? George Bonser (Oct 22)
- Re: DHS and NSA getting married? Christopher Morrow (Oct 22)
- Re: DHS and NSA getting married? todd glassey (Oct 22)