nanog mailing list archives
Re: SORBS on autopilot?
From: Brian Keefer <chort () smtps net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:26:11 -0800
On Jan 11, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
people using SORBS stop using SORBS. -- TTFN, patrick
Usually that's the easiest path. All it takes is asking the site using SORBS to do a few Google searches. There are much better options out there than SORBS. Why anyone thinks it's a good idea to cause that much collateral damage is beyond me. -- bk
Current thread:
- Re: SORBS on autopilot?, (continued)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Brian Keefer (Jan 12)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 12)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? telmnstr (Jan 11)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 11)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? telmnstr (Jan 11)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Steve Ryan (Jan 11)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? William Herrin (Jan 11)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Michelle Sullivan (Jan 15)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Ronald Cotoni (Jan 15)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Michelle Sullivan (Jan 15)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 11)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Brian Keefer (Jan 11)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? William Herrin (Jan 15)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? William Hamilton (Jan 15)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? William Herrin (Jan 15)
- Re: SORBS on autopilot? Larry Sheldon (Jan 15)
- Bad Support Bots (was: SORBS on autopilot?) Michael Thomas (Jan 15)
- Re: Bad Support Bots William Hamilton (Jan 15)
- Re: Bad Support Bots Michael Thomas (Jan 15)
- Re: excessive automation bmanning (Jan 15)