nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email
From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 21:49:54 -0400
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 16:35 -0400, Daniel Senie wrote:
Generally there's little reason to run a secondary MX. Email will queue if the sole MX is offline or unreachable. Email will queue at senders' mail servers.
The problem with the above is that your (or your users') email delivery is then dependent upon the configuration and timeouts of someone else's system (my system drops undeliverables after 1 hour). A backup mx system gives you the capability of getting and keeping what you can, when you can. What you do with it after that is all under your control. -Jim P.
Current thread:
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email, (continued)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Pekka Savola (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Eric A. Hall (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Tony Finch (Jul 06)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Tony Finch (Jul 06)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Owen DeLong (Jul 06)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Daniel Senie (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Brad Knowles (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Todd Vierling (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email David Andersen (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Joe Maimon (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Brad Knowles (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Patrick Muldoon (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Simon Lyall (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Eric A. Hall (Jul 05)