nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 23:30:56 -0400
On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 21:49:54 EDT, Jim Popovitch said:
The problem with the above is that your (or your users') email delivery is then dependent upon the configuration and timeouts of someone else's system (my system drops undeliverables after 1 hour).
Wow. A whole whopping 1% of the RFC2821-recommended 4-5 days. How's that working out for you?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email, (continued)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Tony Finch (Jul 06)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Owen DeLong (Jul 06)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Daniel Senie (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Brad Knowles (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Todd Vierling (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email David Andersen (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Joe Maimon (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Brad Knowles (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Patrick Muldoon (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Simon Lyall (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Eric A. Hall (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Piotr KUCHARSKI (Jul 08)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Brad Knowles (Jul 06)