nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email
From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 16:34:04 -0400
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:27 -0500, Adi Linden wrote:
The first one goes up and down more than it probably should. :-)Make your secondary mx aware of all the valid recipient addresses.
Thank you Adi, Chris, Randy, Daniel, etc. ;-) Syncing virtual/valid users seems to be the preferred method for dealing with this, as opposed to just dev/null'ing. Since the two systems are relatively compatible, I'll look into just pushing the virtualtable to the postfix system. Thanks all, -Jim P.
Current thread:
- OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Adi Linden (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Pekka Savola (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Eric A. Hall (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Tony Finch (Jul 06)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Tony Finch (Jul 06)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Owen DeLong (Jul 06)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Daniel Senie (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Brad Knowles (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)