nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email
From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 23:48:31 -0400
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 23:30 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 21:49:54 EDT, Jim Popovitch said:The problem with the above is that your (or your users') email delivery is then dependent upon the configuration and timeouts of someone else's system (my system drops undeliverables after 1 hour).Wow. A whole whopping 1% of the RFC2821-recommended 4-5 days. How's that working out for you?
Actually quite well. Please understand that I am probably not utilizing and providing email on this system exactly like you or anyone else is. This system provides mailinglist services to dedicated subscribers. Yes, they may experience their own email problems, if prolonged... they can catch up on all that they missed in the mailinglist archives. Keeps my log files clean. :-) -Jim P.
Current thread:
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email, (continued)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Tony Finch (Jul 06)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Owen DeLong (Jul 06)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Daniel Senie (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Brad Knowles (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Todd Vierling (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email David Andersen (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Joe Maimon (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Jim Popovitch (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Brad Knowles (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Patrick Muldoon (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Simon Lyall (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Eric A. Hall (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 05)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Piotr KUCHARSKI (Jul 08)
- Re: OT? /dev/null 5.1.1 email Brad Knowles (Jul 06)