nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSI policy on lame delagations
From: Stephen Stuart <stuart () tech org>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 21:50:10 -0800
Ok; I'm there... but it seems to me that disk caching, possibly application tuned, and 3/4 of a shitload of ram should solve that problem. If you really need to serve that much DNS, you can _afford_ a 4GB Ram Alphaserver, no?
Jerry Scharf once walked me through the math on .com with DNSSEC. 4 GB ... heh, heh, heh. :-) Stephen
Current thread:
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations, (continued)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Paul Vixie (Nov 22)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Vadim Antonov (Nov 22)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Paul A Vixie (Nov 23)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Jon Zeeff (Nov 23)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations jmalcolm (Nov 23)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Paul Vixie (Nov 23)
- Message not available
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 25)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Steven J. Sobol (Nov 23)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Roeland M.J. Meyer (Nov 24)
- Message not available
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 25)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Stephen Stuart (Nov 25)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Vadim Antonov (Nov 26)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Steven J. Sobol (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Randy Bush (Nov 23)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Jon Zeeff (Nov 24)