nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSI policy on lame delagations
From: elezar () pfrc org
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 23:05:26 -0500
On Fri, Nov 20, 1998 at 04:46:15PM -0800, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
Seems that NSI has a new policy on lame delagations. I never heard anything about this. Anyone else?
FWIW, Msen has been blasting the NIC with phone calls and faxes as we find lame delegations. In several instances, these are domains that registered to use us without our permission and in some of them, its a spamming domain. I would prefer a guardian object on our nameservers preventing their unauthorized use and also the ability to remove those objects from records WITHOUT being a contact for the domain. But I'm dreaming...
Patrick Greenwell (800) 299-1288 v
-- Jeffrey Haas "He that breaks a thing to find out what it is has elezar () pfrc org left the paths of wisdom." (Or works for Fermilab...)
Current thread:
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations, (continued)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations jmalcolm (Nov 23)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Paul Vixie (Nov 23)
- Message not available
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 25)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Steven J. Sobol (Nov 23)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Roeland M.J. Meyer (Nov 24)
- Message not available
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 25)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Stephen Stuart (Nov 25)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Vadim Antonov (Nov 26)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Steven J. Sobol (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Randy Bush (Nov 23)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Jon Zeeff (Nov 24)