nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSI policy on lame delagations
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 20:20:28 -0800 (PST)
FWIW, Msen has been blasting the NIC with phone calls and faxes as we find lame delegations. In several instances, these are domains that registered to use us without our permission and in some of them, its a spamming domain.
i figure it just adds to the nic's overload. so, when i find a domain which has been lamely delegated to one of my servers, i just put in an authoritative zone for it with a short ttl soa and a wildcard mx * MX 0 some.schmuck.lame.delegated.to.the.host.name. or the analogous PTR for in-addr zones. it immediately stops any overload on my server and usually gets fixed fairly quickly, no muss no fuss. randy
Current thread:
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations, (continued)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Paul Vixie (Nov 23)
- Message not available
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 25)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Steven J. Sobol (Nov 23)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Roeland M.J. Meyer (Nov 24)
- Message not available
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 25)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Stephen Stuart (Nov 25)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Vadim Antonov (Nov 26)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Steven J. Sobol (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Randy Bush (Nov 23)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Jon Zeeff (Nov 24)