nanog mailing list archives

Re: NSI policy on lame delagations


From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () scfn thpl lib fl us>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 23:34:34 -0500

On Sun, Nov 22, 1998 at 10:38:52PM -0800, Paul Vixie wrote:
Given (for example) PostGreSQL, is there any reason why someone hasn't
ported the algorithms of BIND on top of something like it?  It seems to
me that it ought to be possible to keep a nameserver running whilst one
is doing maintenance on it...

the line of people who have asked for this would stretch out the door and
into the street.  bind runs from memory rather than from disk, because it
has to be able to answer at wire speed for large values of "wire".

Ok; I'm there... but it seems to me that disk caching, possibly
application tuned, and 3/4 of a shitload of ram should solve that
problem.  If you really need to serve that much DNS, you can _afford_ a
4GB Ram Alphaserver, no?

                                                                   we're
working on a hierarchical storage system, basically a memory cache with
LRU, backed by a database.  we're also working on a way to load from sql
databases into memory rather than always having to load from disk.  it's
likely that the second of those two projects will be complete a year or
so before the first :-).

Ah, got it.

in 8.1.2++, though, the goal is to be able to check and/or reload a zone
without having to stat() all the others.  for someone with 50K zones on
board, this should be a huge speedup.

Quite so.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra () baylink com
Member of the Technical Staff     Buy copies of The New Hackers Dictionary.
The Suncoast Freenet            Give them to all your friends.
Tampa Bay, Florida     http://www.ccil.org/jargon/             +1 813 790 7592


Current thread: