nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSI policy on lame delagations
From: Paul A Vixie <paul () vix com>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 18:39:55 -0800
That will change in 8.1.2++, btw. "ndc" will use a socket, not signals.Will 8.1.2++ allow - selective reloads?
yes. "ndc reload vix.com"
- selective cache cleaning (clean this zone ONLY from my cache)?
no. the cache won't have zone boundaries until 9.0.
I always put a zone up on the master before I send in the registration. If the slaves take a day or so to catch up I can live with that.Depends on whether whichever NIC in question demands that *all* listed NS are ready for the domain, or only one, right?
that would be bad policy, since it would not reflect operational necessity. i.e., the zone fundamentally "works" if ANY of its nameservers is working. therefore that ought to be the only test done by any NIC.
Current thread:
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations, (continued)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Roeland M.J. Meyer (Nov 24)
- Message not available
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 25)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Stephen Stuart (Nov 25)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Vadim Antonov (Nov 26)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Steven J. Sobol (Nov 21)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Randy Bush (Nov 23)
- Re: NSI policy on lame delagations Jon Zeeff (Nov 24)