Metasploit mailing list archives

AW: Has anyone seen security tree?


From: all-good at gmx.net (Tim Schellenberger)
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 02:05:51 -0300

Hey there.!

 

After installing the security tree framework, there?re only a couple of
usable exploits
Soo
.in order to ALL those exploits in their database I have

To compile them one by one and add them ? Or am I seeing something wrong
here
.

 

THNX

 

 

 

 

PGP Public Key:

https://keyserver2.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x51A353FABC5662F0

 

Von: K Tucker [mailto:ktucker1022 at yahoo.com] 
Gesendet: Montag, 8. Oktober 2007 20:48
An: framework at metasploit.com
Betreff: Re: [framework] Has anyone seen security tree?

 

I have worked with both and metasploit is by far the superior approach. But
I certainly support their efforts and hope it keeps developing.

H D Moore <hdm at metasploit.com> wrote:

The web interface was modeled after msfweb, and I think they ganked the 
icons we used (which we in turn ganked from who knows where). Besides 
that, there is no similarity. They use existing, pre-compiled exploits to 
fill out the tree, we use explotis designed specifically for the 
framework. I prefer our approach for a number of reasons, but its a lot 
more work to maintain.

-HD

On Monday 08 October 2007 17:11, Mr Gabriel wrote:
I had a quick look around this site, and it looks like these guys are
ripping off metasploit.

Is it a fork of the metasploit project? Or was metasploit a fork of
exploit tree? This is the site

http://securityforest.com/wiki/index.php/Exploitation_Framework



*****
Mr Gabriel
angelisonline at gmail.com
BlackBerry Pin 2047D423

 

  

  _____  

Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! 
Play
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48223/*http:/get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gameke
y=monopolyherenow>  Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy)
at Yahoo! Games.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.metasploit.com/pipermail/framework/attachments/20071009/17dd06a4/attachment.htm>


Current thread: