Metasploit mailing list archives

Has anyone seen security tree?


From: ktucker1022 at yahoo.com (K Tucker)
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:47:42 -0700 (PDT)

I have worked with both and metasploit is by far the superior approach. But I certainly support their efforts and hope 
it keeps developing.

H D Moore <hdm at metasploit.com> wrote: The web interface was modeled after msfweb, and I think they ganked the 
icons we used (which we in turn ganked from who knows where). Besides 
that, there is no similarity. They use existing, pre-compiled exploits to 
fill out the tree, we use explotis designed specifically for the 
framework. I prefer our approach for a number of reasons, but its a lot 
more work to maintain.

-HD

On Monday 08 October 2007 17:11, Mr Gabriel wrote:
I had a quick look around this site, and it looks like these guys are
ripping off metasploit.

Is it a fork of the metasploit project? Or was metasploit a fork of
exploit tree? This is the site

http://securityforest.com/wiki/index.php/Exploitation_Framework



*****
Mr Gabriel
angelisonline at gmail.com
BlackBerry Pin 2047D423


       
---------------------------------
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! 
Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.metasploit.com/pipermail/framework/attachments/20071008/270e6de6/attachment.htm>


Current thread: