Re: Yale switching to Google Apps / Gmail

[David Farber <dave () farber net>]

Begin forwarded message:

From: Johan Ovlinger <johan () ccs neu edu>
Date: February 10, 2010 3:50:05 PM EST
To: dave () farber net
Subject: Re: [IP] re Yale switching to Google Apps / Gmail


> > *From:* Roger Dannenberg <rbd () cs cmu edu <mailto:rbd () cs cmu edu>>
> > *Date:* February 10, 2010 3:15:12 PM EST
> > *To:* <mailto:dave () farber net>dave () farber net <mailto:dave () farber net>
> > *Cc:* ip <ip () v2 listbox com <mailto:ip () v2 listbox com>>, <mailto:adikamdar () gmail com>adikamdar () gmail com 
> > <mailto:adikamdar () gmail com>
> > *Subject:* *Re: [IP] Yale switching to Google Apps / Gmail*
> >
> > [for IP if you wish]
> >
> > I don't want to name names, but the Gmail license agreement is used by a distinguished law professor in his class as 
> > an example of something you should stay away from.

Google sells a search appliance that companies can buy to index their internal web without exposing it to either google 
or the internet at large.

I would have thought that something similar applied to institution-wide gmail deployments (which apparently run ~ $50 
per person [1]).  The paid deployments might have different licenses.

-- johan

[1] http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/004161.php




-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com