Honeypots mailing list archives

Re: Jail Time for Honeypots?


From: Kevin Saenz <ksaenz () spinaweb com au>
Date: 22 Apr 2003 06:51:27 +1000

In my neck of the woods there is a double edge sword when it comes
to security if you have a beware of dog sign on your front gate
and a would be burgular gets attacked then you are held liable because
you knew the dog is dangerous. On another note with cctv, you have
to inform people by either signs or word of mouth that you possibly
have cctv on your property. Then again we are a little backwards when
it comes to IT considering one of our Government departments paid
$4million for a web site and still the price is increasing.


Be sure that the camera at the door will only see who is in your door and
not everybody that is crossing the street ... in some countries that can be
a legal issue :)
Another example in cctv systems is that you can only see the recorded images
only if there is a crime, and not any time you want ...
Or that you can only have recorded images for 30 days ...
May be honeypots must/should respect the same kind of restrictions ...

FM

----- Original Message -----
From: "Octavian POPESCU" <sigquit () netbastards org>
To: <honeypots () securityfocus com>
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: Jail Time for Honeypots?


ok now, so which would be the next step? to put me in jail for installing
surveillance cameras in my apartment?
should I notify the burlgar via written signs that my apartment is
monitored?
this is plain stupid.
-- 
Regards,

Kevin Saenz
 
Spinaweb
Your one stop shop for I.T solutions.
 
Ph: 02 4620 5130
Fax: 02 4625 9243
Mobile: 0418455661
Web: http://www.spinaweb.com.au


Current thread: