funsec mailing list archives

Re: Apparently Milgram is still right


From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:51:26 -0600 (CST)

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
I should have added, that what is also taught to all soldiers is that
just because you can, or are told, to do something, doesn't mean you
should.

Many of these techniques are taught so that we can learn how to resist
them.

I think a lot of the problem is the lack of moral education in society
in general. What is noteworthy about Abu Ghraib is that the soldiers
involved were all relatively junior, and not Regular Army.

I will stop reading here. Moral education can be determined by whoever 
decides what's concensus for morals this year.

Analytical and critical thinking, on the other hand, as well as awareness 
of emotions (erm..) are something else entirely. How much of that is the 
army going to waste on soldiers?


As far as Guantanamo goes: (says he sensing the rising hue and cry) I
hold with John McCain on the matter, and he, who knows like no other
elected official in the US about torture, was opposed to it from the
first.

If we become what we seek to defeat, the enemy has won.


-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org]
On Behalf Of Tomas L. Byrnes
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 11:40 PM
To: Gadi Evron
Cc: funsec () linuxbox org; Alex Eckelberry; Rob,grandpa of Ryan, Trevor,
Devon & Hannah; cissp-ethics () yahoogroups com
Subject: Re: [funsec] Apparently Milgram is still right

All are taught at the war college.



-----Original Message-----
From: Gadi Evron [mailto:ge () linuxbox org]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 11:26 PM
To: Tomas L. Byrnes
Cc: Alex Eckelberry; Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah;
funsec () linuxbox org; cissp-ethics () yahoogroups com
Subject: RE: [funsec] Apparently Milgram is still right

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
The experiment is a dual one:

1: How far can someone be manipulated.

2: Are people really such sheep?

My unscientific gut says that if you took the sample primarily from
the
US Military, you'd get lots of demurs.

The average Joe doesn't know what voltage is likely to hurt, or what
the
laws of land warfare are.

I think all this proves is that humans are highly influenced by
their
social environment.

Read up on (YouTube will do): Standford Prison Experiment
Books to grab: Hogan's on cults (forgot the name), Influence by
Cialdini



-----Original Message-----
From: Gadi Evron [mailto:ge () linuxbox org]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 11:04 PM
To: Alex Eckelberry
Cc: Tomas L. Byrnes; Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah;
funsec () linuxbox org; cissp-ethics () yahoogroups com
Subject: RE: [funsec] Apparently Milgram is still right

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Alex Eckelberry wrote:
True, and there is a point of ethics vs. morals.  But in the end,
there's a line that, IMHO, shouldn't be crossed.

The participants themselves were manipulated. Their ethics are
fine,
they
are simply not aware of what's going on or how to resist it.

Smart people as we may be, we all treat dozens of things
automatically,
which can be abused. Belief in authority is one thing.. training
for
suspended disbelief in movies is another.

The ethical issue here is the experiment being conducted.


Besides, at a purely ethical level, torture is a low-quality
interrogation technique.  It's overrated in its effectiveness, and
creates boomerang effects which don't benefit an overall cause.

Nevertheless, even arguing torture at a logical level is difficult
for
me.  It's just reprehensible, not because of some pacificist
ideology:
Because beating the living shit out of someone for information
brings
us
to the level of animals, and that's what we've been trying to
evolve
from for a very long time.

Something Matthew Alexander spoke and wrote of recently:

http://snipurl.com/8wosv


Alex

-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org
[mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org]
On Behalf Of Tomas L. Byrnes
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 8:19 PM
To: Gadi Evron; Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah
Cc: funsec () linuxbox org; cissp-ethics () yahoogroups com
Subject: Re: [funsec] Apparently Milgram is still right

I guess it depends on who you think you owe an ethical duty to,
doesn't
it.



-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-
bounces () linuxbox org]
On Behalf Of Gadi Evron
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 4:11 PM
To: Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah
Cc: funsec () linuxbox org; cissp-ethics () yahoogroups com
Subject: Re: [funsec] Apparently Milgram is still right

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah
wrote:
People are still willing to torture people, when told to do so
by
an
authority.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/-/2/hi/health/7791278.stm

This may explain some recent happenings, but it is still
disturbing,
nonetheless.
We in infosec, and members of society as a whole, have to push
harder
on the
ethics front.

What does this have to do with ethics?
It's a trick question, think before answering. :)



======================  (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus
Mailer)
rslade () vcn bc ca     slade () victoria tc ca
rslade () computercrime org
This day I call heaven and earth as witnesses against you that I
have

set before you life and death, blessings and curses.  Now
choose life....                                  - Deuteronomy
30:19
victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm
blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.



_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: