funsec mailing list archives

Re: Apparently Milgram is still right


From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:40:22 -0800

Which, given that the resistance of the body to which the current is
applied is relatively constant, is dependent on the voltage, up to the
maximum current the power supply can deliver.

In terms of delivering pain, voltage and pulse width can have more of an
effect than raw current, which effectively works by cooking. IE: You can
deliver lots of pain for little physical damage using the "correct"
circuit.

Not advocating torture, just pointing out that the physics are at least
as complex as the ethics.


-----Original Message-----
From: Blue Boar [mailto:BlueBoar () thievco com]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 10:19 AM
To: Tomas L. Byrnes
Cc: Gadi Evron; Alex Eckelberry; funsec () linuxbox org; Rob, grandpa of
Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah; cissp-ethics () yahoogroups com
Subject: Re: [funsec] Apparently Milgram is still right

It's not the volts, it's the amps.

                                      BB

Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
The experiment is a dual one:

1: How far can someone be manipulated.

2: Are people really such sheep?

My unscientific gut says that if you took the sample primarily from
the
US Military, you'd get lots of demurs.

The average Joe doesn't know what voltage is likely to hurt, or what
the
laws of land warfare are.

I think all this proves is that humans are highly influenced by their
social environment.



-----Original Message-----
From: Gadi Evron [mailto:ge () linuxbox org]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 11:04 PM
To: Alex Eckelberry
Cc: Tomas L. Byrnes; Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah;
funsec () linuxbox org; cissp-ethics () yahoogroups com
Subject: RE: [funsec] Apparently Milgram is still right

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Alex Eckelberry wrote:
True, and there is a point of ethics vs. morals.  But in the end,
there's a line that, IMHO, shouldn't be crossed.
The participants themselves were manipulated. Their ethics are fine,
they
are simply not aware of what's going on or how to resist it.

Smart people as we may be, we all treat dozens of things
automatically,
which can be abused. Belief in authority is one thing.. training for
suspended disbelief in movies is another.

The ethical issue here is the experiment being conducted.


Besides, at a purely ethical level, torture is a low-quality
interrogation technique.  It's overrated in its effectiveness, and
creates boomerang effects which don't benefit an overall cause.

Nevertheless, even arguing torture at a logical level is difficult
for
me.  It's just reprehensible, not because of some pacificist
ideology:
Because beating the living shit out of someone for information
brings
us
to the level of animals, and that's what we've been trying to
evolve
from for a very long time.

Something Matthew Alexander spoke and wrote of recently:

http://snipurl.com/8wosv


Alex

-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org
[mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org]
On Behalf Of Tomas L. Byrnes
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 8:19 PM
To: Gadi Evron; Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah
Cc: funsec () linuxbox org; cissp-ethics () yahoogroups com
Subject: Re: [funsec] Apparently Milgram is still right

I guess it depends on who you think you owe an ethical duty to,
doesn't
it.



-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-
bounces () linuxbox org]
On Behalf Of Gadi Evron
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 4:11 PM
To: Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah
Cc: funsec () linuxbox org; cissp-ethics () yahoogroups com
Subject: Re: [funsec] Apparently Milgram is still right

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah
wrote:
People are still willing to torture people, when told to do so by
an
authority.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/-/2/hi/health/7791278.stm

This may explain some recent happenings, but it is still
disturbing,
nonetheless.
We in infosec, and members of society as a whole, have to push
harder
on the
ethics front.
What does this have to do with ethics?
It's a trick question, think before answering. :)


======================  (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus
Mailer)
rslade () vcn bc ca     slade () victoria tc ca
rslade () computercrime org
This day I call heaven and earth as witnesses against you that I
have
set before you life and death, blessings and curses.  Now
choose life....                                  - Deuteronomy
30:19
victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm
blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: