funsec mailing list archives
Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail
From: Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 00:01:46 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:31:45 GMT, Drsolly said:On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:21:56 GMT, Drsolly said:Suppose an ISP has a million paid subscribers, and 100,000 of those give an AOL address as their primary address. Now, suppose that ISP needs to...about the ongoing business relationship). So that ISP might well decide that it's worth paying $1000 (assuming 1c per email) to ensure that theiremail doesn't get blocked.The problem with the GoodMail scheme is that they pay a penny a piece for all million recipients. That's $10K, not $1K. Yes, you read that right.Please re-read my example. I was supposing a (non-spam) mailing by an ISP of 1 million, of which 100,000 goes to AOL members, which means a cost of $1000.Right. I was pointing out that in *reality*, GoodMail will bill on the *total* volume, not the volume that goes to GoodMail customers. So if you send a mailing of 1M pieces of mail, of which *one* goes to AOL, you're *still* on the hook for $10K.
Yes. But if I send the 999,999 not via GoddMail and the one via Goodmail, then I'm on the hook for $0.01 _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail, (continued)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Nick FitzGerald (Feb 06)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 07)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Drsolly (Feb 06)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Dude VanWinkle (Feb 07)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Drsolly (Feb 07)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Dude VanWinkle (Feb 07)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Drsolly (Feb 07)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 07)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Drsolly (Feb 07)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 07)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Drsolly (Feb 08)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Richard Cox (Feb 08)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 08)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Drsolly (Feb 08)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail der Mouse (Feb 08)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 08)
- RE: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 08)
- Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 08)
- RE: Re[2]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Larry Seltzer (Feb 08)
- Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 08)
- Re[4]: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Pierre Vandevenne (Feb 08)
- Re: Postage Is Due for Companies Sending E-Mail Nick FitzGerald (Feb 06)