Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam!
From: "Daniel" <dan () lockedbox net>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 04:24:11 +0000
Michael Gale <michael () bluesuperman com> wrote:
Hello, Do you know how PGP signatures work, you need to have the person who signed it / created the PGP sig to somehow securely provide you with their key to validate it.
Ummm, no, that is why we have public/private keys. The private key can be used to sign and the public key used to verify. Yes you can create a key from an address that is not your own. But if you recieve a message from bill () microsoft com you would exspect a key to say the same. Regards, Daniel B. ---------------------------------------- Please do not send me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! onedo (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Peter Moody (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Damian Gerow (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Ciro (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Nick FitzGerald (Nov 12)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Michael Gale (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Scott Taylor (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Michael Gale (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Daniel (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Michael Gale (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Steffen Kluge (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Michael Gale (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Chris Ruvolo (Nov 12)
- Re: PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! onedo (Nov 12)
- Re: PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Shawn McMahon (Nov 13)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Peter Moody (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 12)