Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam!
From: Damian Gerow <damian () sentex net>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:03:08 -0500
Thus spake Peter Moody (peter () ucsc edu) [11/11/03 21:53]:
As far as signed mail getting picked up by spam filters, I would think that talking to the admins would be your best bet. But again, in time spam filters will recognize that pgp signature does not equal spam.
And conversely, a pgp signature does not equal /not/ spam. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! onedo (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Peter Moody (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Damian Gerow (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Ciro (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Nick FitzGerald (Nov 12)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Michael Gale (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Scott Taylor (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Michael Gale (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Daniel (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Michael Gale (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Steffen Kluge (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Michael Gale (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Chris Ruvolo (Nov 12)
- Re: PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! onedo (Nov 12)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Peter Moody (Nov 11)