Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam!
From: Ciro <domino () asgardnet org>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 22:40:23 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Peter Moody wrote:
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:41:00 -0800 From: Peter Moody <peter () ucsc edu> To: onedo () gmx net Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam!Guys(and girls), the situation sucks. What do you think? And, most important of all, do you see any way to fight this behaviour? Because honestly, I don't.I frequently get messages from virus filters telling me that my attachment (signature.asc) has been removed as it's thought to contain a virus. For the virus end, it'll take time for people to start coding proper virus scanners that don't recognize .asc as a virus.
I don't expect that to come about until we can get virus scanners that aren't set by default to spam the receiver (or the forged From: address) with notices that some worm spam(SWEN, Sobig, etc...) was blocked. -- "Why would burgulars need to look for a backdoor when they can climb in through Windows?" --Norman L DeForest, in NANAE "You know how dumb the average luser is? Well, half of 'em are dumber than that" -- The Roadie, in NANAE _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! onedo (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Peter Moody (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Damian Gerow (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Ciro (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Nick FitzGerald (Nov 12)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Michael Gale (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Scott Taylor (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Michael Gale (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Daniel (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Michael Gale (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Steffen Kluge (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Michael Gale (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Chris Ruvolo (Nov 12)
- Re: PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! onedo (Nov 12)
- Re: PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Shawn McMahon (Nov 13)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Peter Moody (Nov 11)