Full Disclosure mailing list archives
a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam!
From: onedo () gmx net
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 03:22:25 +0100
Hi everyone I had to notice something today that really disturbed me. A friend of mine(working for a very big company) complained, that she doesn't get any mails from me anymore. It turned out, that apparently my mails went straight into the spam filter, as I signed everyone of them. When I sent unsigned mails, she got them. What do we learn? Crypto is bad m'kay? But for real, does that mean that we won't be able to sign any mails anymore soon, due to the spam problem(and stupid admins)? 'EGovernment' is the big word everywhere nowadays. The electronic signature is mentioned as a way to ensure the credidibility of sender and receiver. Now what? Guys(and girls), the situation sucks. What do you think? And, most important of all, do you see any way to fight this behaviour? Because honestly, I don't. Greets $me _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! onedo (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Peter Moody (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Damian Gerow (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Ciro (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Nick FitzGerald (Nov 12)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Michael Gale (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Scott Taylor (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Michael Gale (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Daniel (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Michael Gale (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Steffen Kluge (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Michael Gale (Nov 11)
- Re: a PGP signed mail? Has to be spam! Peter Moody (Nov 11)