Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Castles and Security (fwd)
From: Adam Shostack <adam () homeport org>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 14:53:31 -0500
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:26:32PM -0500, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
I keep coming back to this issue of improving targeting and it seems like lots of people don't "get it" - I'm worried that I'm not communicating effectively, or something. Am I being obscure?
You're using an analogy which folks with a background in the military, or military history get, and others don't. I don't think you're being obscure, but I will argue that targeting is not as valuable as you hope. The problem is the effect of firing for effect. You're going to put a large number of children in jail. (We could argue that they're not children, etc, etc, but thats not relevant. You'll put some 14 year old honor photogenic honor student away, and we'll be in the child-vs-adult debate.) You can sometimes solve terrorism problems when you have a small number of terrorists by smashing the terrorist group. The western democracies now all have units who are trained to enter a terrorist situation, and kill all the terrorists. They do this because if you take the terrorists prisoner, then they spend time in jail agitating while their friends become terrorists and demand their release. Also, it seems to be an effective deterrent to terrorism to know that you're not going to make it out alive. However, this doesn't work when you can't kill the terrorists. A few years of juvinile detention for a small fraction of script-kiddies is not going to deter all the rest. The only ways I'm aware of that terrorism campaigns are stopped when you have a large population of recruits is through a hearts and minds campaign (Ireland, Malaysia--you can argue these), or by a massive crackdown (Soviet Russia). So, lets assume that you have perfect targeting capability: You can backtrace any vandalism you want. Lets also assume a set of costs: $50, $50,000, and $5 million. What do you do in each of these cases? Adam -- "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -Hume _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd), (continued)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) Darren Reed (Jan 03)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) John McDermott (Jan 03)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) Darren Reed (Jan 03)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) M.Schubert (Jan 04)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) Darren Reed (Jan 03)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) Darren Reed (Jan 03)
- Re: Castles and Security Title Randy Grimshaw (Jan 04)
- RE: Castles and Security (fwd) daN. (Jan 03)
- RE: Castles and Security (fwd) Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 04)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) Neil Buckley (Jan 05)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) Adam Shostack (Jan 08)
- Targeting (was Castles and Security) Stephen P. Berry (Jan 08)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) Darren Reed (Jan 03)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) George Capehart (Jan 05)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) Ryan Russell (Jan 08)