Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Castles and Security (fwd)
From: twaszak () Telenisus com
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 03:54:09 -0600
I don't think there is such a thing as a perfect analogy. The only analogies that are not flawed are the ones that describe simple concepts that probably don't need an analogy. By my way of thinking, an analogy should serve as an aid to make a complicated concept easier to understand by people who are not experts. It's purpose is not to explain a concept to people who already understand. The analogy should balance simplicity with accuracy and applicability. Also the simplicity/applicability/accuracy of analogy is all about how it is presented. I like the idea of terrorism or guerrilla warfare being a more accurate analogy for describing the confusion and chaos that dealing with security issues can be. I'd love to talk all day long about LIC, MIC, HIC, terrorist motivations, terrorist and counter-terrorist tactics, malaysian ambushes, cross border ops, CQB tactics, AirLand2000, bounding overwatches, scroll to the road, interlocking fields of fire, and how Micheal Collins is the father of urban guerilla warfare.....etc. As much as I would like to use terrorism or guerrilla/unconventional warfare as an analogy, I can not. Unless my audience was comprised of most of the people responding to this topic or Agency/Spec Op types, very few would understand. Terrorism and guerilla warefare are complicated issues in and of themselves. Nations with large military and intelligence agencies at their disposal have a hard time understanding and dealing with these issues. I certainly couldn't use a single slide to explain how they are like info sec like I can with the castle analogy. Since my audience is primarily non-Agency/Spec Op and non-security types, I'll use simple castles to preach to the ignorant masses and make converts. I'll use the more interesting and accurate terrorism/unconventional warfare analogy when I'm preaching to the choir (talking to other security people);-) Cheers, Thomas _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: Castles and Security Title, (continued)
- Re: Castles and Security Title Randy Grimshaw (Jan 04)
- RE: Castles and Security (fwd) daN. (Jan 03)
- RE: Castles and Security (fwd) Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 04)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) Neil Buckley (Jan 05)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) Adam Shostack (Jan 08)
- Targeting (was Castles and Security) Stephen P. Berry (Jan 08)
- RE: Castles and Security (fwd) Marcus J. Ranum (Jan 03)
- RE: Castles and Security (fwd) Harris, Tim (Jan 03)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) Darren Reed (Jan 03)
- RE: Castles and Security (fwd) Frank Knobbe (Jan 03)
- RE: Castles and Security (fwd) twaszak (Jan 04)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) jeradonah (Jan 04)
- RE: Castles and Security (fwd) Bill_Royds (Jan 04)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) George Capehart (Jan 05)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) Ryan Russell (Jan 08)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) George Capehart (Jan 08)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) George Capehart (Jan 05)
- Re: Castles and Security (fwd) Darren Reed (Jan 10)
- RE: Castles and Security (fwd) Robert Graham (Jan 12)