Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance
From: "Saravana Ram" <Ram () POP Jaring My>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 13:59:41 +0800
I would like to get the wizards' take on what people are doing with respect to staying connected and functional on the Internet during the rollover to the year 2000. Do most organizations seem to be leaning towards reduced exposure (i.e. shutting down incoming SMTP, restricting download cpability, etc.), total blackout, or business as usual.
If one is doubt of the Y2k compliance of their webservers, mailservers, routers, and firewalls, he/she should have done their homework by now. All machines should have been taken off-air and had their clocks changed to pre-Y2K, watch the rollover to check for any problems, reset the clocks to the real time, and put back all machines on-line. This, of cource, should have been done months ago. Firewalls are generaly new products, and wont have Y2k rollover problems. Most people run webservers that are fairly new too. Routers should have been checked long ago. If everything has been tested before to be Y2k-okay, then I see no reason to reduce exposure or shut things off.
Current thread:
- Y2K rollover Vigilance Brad MacQuarrie (Dec 06)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Saravana Ram (Dec 07)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Lance Spitzner (Dec 07)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Alejandro Rusell (Dec 07)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Saravana Ram (Dec 08)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Don Helms (Dec 08)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Daniel Monjar (Dec 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Zzzil (Dec 08)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Brad MacQuarrie (Dec 08)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Paul Grabow (Dec 30)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Saravana Ram (Dec 07)