Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance
From: Daniel Monjar <dmonjar () monjard orgtek com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 12:19:27 -0500
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 01:59:41PM +0800, Saravana Ram wrote:
I would like to get the wizards' take on what people are doing with respect to staying connected and functional on the Internet during the rollover to the year 2000. Do most organizations seem to be leaning towards reduced exposure (i.e. shutting down incoming SMTP, restricting download cpability, etc.), total blackout, or business as usual.If one is doubt of the Y2k compliance of their webservers, mailservers, routers, and firewalls, he/she should have done their homework by now.
WRT email I think there is something to be said for queued incoming Internet mail on an intermediate host and waiting for the vrius scan vendors to update their definitions. After new defs are in place the queued mail can be deliveried to the MTA running the virus scan. -- Daniel Monjar Organon Teknika Durham, NC US
Current thread:
- Y2K rollover Vigilance Brad MacQuarrie (Dec 06)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Saravana Ram (Dec 07)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Lance Spitzner (Dec 07)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Alejandro Rusell (Dec 07)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Saravana Ram (Dec 08)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Don Helms (Dec 08)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Daniel Monjar (Dec 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Zzzil (Dec 08)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Brad MacQuarrie (Dec 08)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Paul Grabow (Dec 30)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Saravana Ram (Dec 07)