Re: Java Enterprise Safe ??

[Adriel Desautels <adriel () netragard com>]

Java has better security when it doesn't contain vulnerabilities. The
code isn't always the problem, sometimes the interpreter is the problem.
In most cases though, it is the developer as suggested before. Java can
be very safe.

Regards,
        Adriel T. Desautels
        Chief Technology Officer
        Netragard, LLC.
        Office : 617-934-0269
        Mobile : 617-633-3821
        http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/118/a45

        Join the Netragard, LLC. Linked In Group:
        http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/48683/0B98E1705142

------------------------------------------------
Netragard, LLC - "The Specialist in Anti-Hacking"

Netragard Whitepaper Downloads:
-------------------------------
Choosing the right provider : http://tinyurl.com/2ahk3j
Three Things you must know  : http://tinyurl.com/26pjsn


Gleb Paharenko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> IMHO, java projects have better security. Variable binding and no
> dynamic sql significantly improves sqli strength.
>
> 2008/10/7 Mattias Hemmmingsson <mattias () fareoffice com>:
> God morning
>
> We are now working with java enterprise at the glassfish server.
> And a come of thinking how secure is java really ?
>
>
> If you look att OWASP home page you can find the ten most common
> security risk against java,
>
> So with XSS how mutch damiage can you do to the system ore can you
> only change the clients view ?
>
> Sql injection is it poosible to do with java enterprise ?
>
> And the big one JAS ( java auth system or somthing like that) How safe
> is it realy ?
>
>
> // matte
>
> >