Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: A reminder that security is not inherently solvable with technology
From: "John T. Hoffoss" <hoff0438 () umn edu>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 20:14:24 -0600
The ACM also provides a similar service. I think this could be a useful thing in the IT sector if both employers and registered IT people gave it some weight. I don't think this would ever be able to carry that much weight though; there are too many hacks who call themselves IT pros, and it would cost money to build up a registry, test them, whatever. [I think] The only reason such a thing exists in the medical industry, engineering industries, etc. is that these people need licenses (permission) to perform in their jobs. We do not (currently.) -John On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 12:21:53PM -0500, Steve wrote:
Building off Jeremiah's email about a Hippocratic oath for IT, this is where our profession is vastly different than many others, we lack a formal standard code of ethics. We do have formal education, we have continuing education, and so forth. But while doctors are governed by regulatory bodies and lawyers and so forth, we in IT are not. I do believe we are true professionals though. There are some associations for IT that offer their own code of ethics. The Network Professional Association (NPA) has one. http://www.npanet.org/public/about_codeofethics.cfm There are other IT related associations that have them as well. The NPA has looked at having a real registry of the members where background checks validate education and experience for anyone to see or upon request, would something like a real registry of IT professionals benefit our industry?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Forum Systems PRESIDIO: PGP / XML GATEWAY APPLIANCE The Presidio integrates PGP data encryption and XML Web Services security to simplify the management and deployment of PGP and reduce overall PGP costs by up to 80%. FREE WHITEPAPER & 30 Day Trial - http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/ForumSystems_security-basics_031027 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- hunt tool Jorge Garcia (Oct 21)
- Re: hunt tool Toyama no Benbei (Oct 22)
- A reminder that security is not inherently solvable with technology JGrimshaw (Oct 23)
- Re: A reminder that security is not inherently solvable with technology Kamal Habayeb (Oct 23)
- Re: A reminder that security is not inherently solvable with technology Paul O'Malley (Oct 24)
- RE: A reminder that security is not inherently solvable withtechnology Mike Peppard (Oct 24)
- RE: A reminder that security is not inherently solvable with technology Jeremiah Powell (Oct 27)
- Re: A reminder that security is not inherently solvable with technology Steve (Oct 27)
- Re: A reminder that security is not inherently solvable with technology John T. Hoffoss (Oct 28)
- A reminder that security is not inherently solvable with technology JGrimshaw (Oct 23)
- Re: hunt tool Toyama no Benbei (Oct 22)
- RE: A reminder that security is not inherently solvable with technology jm (Oct 23)
- RE: A reminder that security is not inherently solvable with technology Tsai Li Ming (Oct 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: hunt tool Jorge Garcia (Oct 22)
- Re: hunt tool Eric Hagen (Oct 22)
- Re: hunt tool Jorge Garcia (Oct 24)