Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: hacksdmi?
From: "Bluefish (P.Magnusson)" <11a () GMX NET>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 01:49:59 +0200
Having a look at SDMI :) http://www.sdmi.org/download/port_device_spec_part1.pdf Page 33 shows that source code is not to be released of how the circuits works (non-disclosure/non-use); they make a difference between source code and HDL-source code and they don't understand the difference between VHDL and Verilog. They acronym "Verilog Hardware Description Language" VHDL. Page 31 outlines a number of buses which may not recieve content. Alas it assumes you to buy new hardware. Due to clumpsy choices of words, it actually does seem that you may not use PCI in a portable device ;-) And have a look at paragraph 10.2.3.1, it seems software implementations are recommended to run as root in order to avoid content hacking... or *something*. Perhaps they didn't understand when I install operating system X, I become the super user? Another excelent supposed messure is encrypting your application.......... Additionally, page 28 have a picture of the supposed secure A->D device. I thought the DVD consortium & DVD CCA was stupid because they managed to make a number of really clumpsy misstakes, but at least they seemed to have some clues of what they where doing. SDMI seems to be insanely clueless of much, not only the technology they're supposed to develop ;) Page 26 mentions that in june, 1999 was the last time to supply solutions to the watermark/screening problem. Given the flawed files offered in the contest, I suspect they realised that the researchers being sceptical turned out right in the end ;-) Anyone having time to look at other documents at http://www.sdmi.org, they may find themselves a good joke or two there. Perhaps we're taking part in some X-Files episodes? I can almost see Mulder explain the plot to Scully: "The aliens are experimenting with the public! By creating more and more organisations and companies runned by fools, they're trying to <insert evil stuff here>" ..:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.. http://www.11a.nu || http://bluefish.11a.nu eleventh alliance development & security team http://www.eff.org/cafe
Current thread:
- SDMI - The way I would make the water mark., (continued)
- SDMI - The way I would make the water mark. Richard Rager (Oct 13)
- Re: SDMI - The way I would make the water mark. Robert Collins (Oct 13)
- Re: SDMI - The way I would make the water mark. buggz (Oct 13)
- Re: SDMI - The way I would make the water mark. Steve Mosher (Oct 13)
- Re: SDMI - The way I would make the water mark. Ben Galehouse (Oct 14)
- Re: SDMI - The way I would make the water mark. Bluefish (P.Magnusson) (Oct 14)
- Re: hacksdmi? Ralph Moonen (Oct 13)
- Re: hacksdmi? Masial (Oct 13)
- Re: hacksdmi? spiff (Oct 14)
- Message not available
- Re: SDMI - The way I would make the water mark. Ralph Moonen (Oct 14)
- Re: hacksdmi? Steve Mosher (Oct 12)
- Re: hacksdmi? David Knaack (Oct 12)
- Re: hacksdmi? Robert Johnson (Oct 13)
- Re: hacksdmi? Robert A. Seace (Oct 13)
- Re: hacksdmi? Granquist, Lamont (Oct 14)
- Re: hacksdmi? Ben Galehouse (Oct 15)
- Re: hacksdmi? David Knaack (Oct 16)