nanog mailing list archives
Re: Juniper hardware recommendation
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 16:25:21 +0200
On 5/10/21 16:19, aaron1 () gvtc com wrote:
I prefer MX204 over the ACX5048. The ACX5048 can’t add L3 interface to an mpls layer 2 type of service. There are other limitations to the ACX5048 that cause me to want to possibly replace them with MX204’s. But in defense of the ACX5048, we have gotten some good mileage (a few years now) of good resi/busi bb over vrf’s and also carrier ethernet for businesses and lots of cell backhaul… so they are good for that. I’ve heard the ACX5448 was even better.
Trio will always provide better features, but come with the price tag to boot.
I’m looking at the MX240 for the SCB3E MPC10E hefty with 100 gig ports
You might want to look at the MX10003, in that case, as well. We are deploying those for 100Gbps service (customer-facing). Works out cheaper than offering 100Gbps service on the MX240/480/960 for the same task.
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation, (continued)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mann, Jason via NANOG (May 07)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Alain Hebert (May 07)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Marco Paesani (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Baldur Norddahl (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Baldur Norddahl (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 09)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mann, Jason via NANOG (May 07)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 10)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation aaron1 (May 10)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 10)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation Adam Thompson (May 14)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Jason Healy (May 16)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Colton Conor (May 16)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 16)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Jon Lewis (May 16)