nanog mailing list archives
Re: Juniper hardware recommendation
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 09:12:21 +0200
On 5/8/21 00:56, Mann, Jason via NANOG wrote:
We are using MX204's as our internet routers and I want to replace our ASR's with them to be used as an aggregate circuit router. With the amount of 10G/40G/100G interface and the price point we have been happy with them. The big issue was learning Junos since we are cisco shop
Terribly happy with the MX204. We've been running them for nearly 2 years now.
I just wish Juniper could make an MX204-lite, one with more 10Gbps port density, e.t.c.
We run it as a peering and Metro-E router. Mark.
Current thread:
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation, (continued)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation Adam Thompson (May 14)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Nick Hilliard (May 14)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Vincent Bernat (May 14)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation Ryan Hamel (May 07)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation Javier Gutierrez Guerra (May 07)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation Tony Wicks (May 07)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Stephen M (May 07)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation Javier Gutierrez Guerra (May 07)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Alain Hebert (May 07)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Marco Paesani (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Baldur Norddahl (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Baldur Norddahl (May 08)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 09)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 10)
- RE: Juniper hardware recommendation aaron1 (May 10)
- Re: Juniper hardware recommendation Mark Tinka (May 10)