Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...)

[Zed Usser <zzuser () yahoo com>]

--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
> Oh, I expect CGN/LSN to be connectivity of last resort, no
> question.
  Ok, so let's just deploy it and not even try to fix it? Even when it is a required functionality for IPv6-only hosts 
to access the IPv4 domain? That'll go down real well with end-users and really cut down on the operational and support 
issues enumerated earlier.

- Zed