Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...)

[Zed Usser <zzuser () yahoo com>]

--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
> >   So, in essence, you are advocating not to
> >  interconnect the IPv4-only and IPv6-only domains in any way?
>
> I'm advocating not depending on any such interaction
> working as it's pretty clear that
> the available solution set is fairly broken.
  Fair enough. This approach will, however, relegate IPv6-only networks to second class citizenship status. Access to 
the "real" Internet will require IPv4 and IPv6-only will be seen as the inferior choice, to be avoided as best as you 
can. Not quite a ringing endorsement for IPv6, in other words.

  This position also assumes that there will be enough IPv4 addresses to go around for everybody to dual stack. Anybody 
not so fortunate will simply be left out in the cold.

- Zed