nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions
From: Martin Pels <martin.pels () ams-ix net>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:26:15 +0100
Hi, On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:44:56 -0800 Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org> wrote:
In a message written on Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 04:36:28PM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:leaking the IX prefix to customers, to me, seems like a recipe for much wider/unintended leakage :(Oh, it is. I remember when MAE-EAST was injected by at least 50 people into the DFZ because back then people weren't careful enough to just send such things to customers. AMS-IX (and others) have the better solution. They have AS1200, announce the exchange LAN from AS1200 (195.69.144.0/22). They will peer with you if you are at the exchange, see http://www.ams-ix.net/as1200-peering/. I believe, but can't find a reference really quick that they get transit for it from a couple of providers so those that don't peer still have the route.
We advertise 195.69.144.0/22 with no-export. Kind regards, Martin
Current thread:
- RE: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions, (continued)
- RE: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Feb 18)
- Re: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions Christopher Morrow (Feb 18)
- RE: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Feb 18)
- Re: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions Christopher Morrow (Feb 18)
- Re: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions Leo Bicknell (Feb 18)
- Re: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions Christopher Morrow (Feb 18)
- Re: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions Joe Abley (Feb 18)
- Re: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions Leo Bicknell (Feb 18)
- Re: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions Christopher Morrow (Feb 18)
- Re: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions Leo Bicknell (Feb 18)
- Re: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions Martin Pels (Feb 19)
- Re: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- Re: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions Bill Woodcock (Feb 17)