nanog mailing list archives

Re: NAP Architecture


From: "Alec H. Peterson" <ahp () hilander com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 12:28:33 -0500

On Wed, Oct 29, 1997 at 08:25:33AM -0800, Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI wrote:

   Forgive my ignorance on these matters, but why haven't many NAPS tried
to be L1 based, or at least provide the option of private wire/fiber
between the larger customers in the same room.  It seems to me that this
would significantly reduce the complexity and packet-loss we're currently
seeing.  How long would it take to troubleshoot a cross-over FE compared
to trouble shooting two routers connected via a oversubscribed switch.

The PAIX is doing something very similar to this.  The prices for
interconnects between cages are very reasonable.

Alec

-- 
+------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
|Alec Peterson - ahp () hilander com    | Erols Internet Services, INC.        |
|Network Engineer                    | Springfield, VA.                     |
+------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+


Current thread: