nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAP Architecture
From: bmanning () ISI EDU
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 06:14:39 -0800 (PST)
Why aren't one-off costs enough? There is *no* re-occuring costs with a cable hanging on the ceiling.
See previous post wrt insurance,utilities,rent and manpower costs. D-Rings are not the results of immaculate inception nor are they a "commons" where anyone can, for a single modest fee have a claim in perpetuity for space rights. Of course some take the tactic of regular fixed fees to cover the incidentals of ongoing cost recovery and periodic maintinance. Others work on a time/materials basis. -- --bill
Current thread:
- Re: NAP Architecture, (continued)
- Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture bmanning (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture the Riz (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alec H. Peterson (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Mike Leber (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Bill Manning (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture bmanning (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture bmanning (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture Leigh Porter (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Deepak Jain (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI (Oct 29)
- Message not available
- Re: NAP Architecture Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI (Oct 29)