nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAP Architecture
From: Bill Manning <bmanning () ISI EDU>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 21:12:19 -0800 (PST)
While there is no vaild reason for a monthly reoccuring on a cross connect. Unless, there is a tech going out and dusting the cross-connect every month? Any carrier who charges monthly chrages on a wire hanging in D-Ring, while collecting money for the cross connected parties to even be in the same building, is not very nice. A one time fee ($250 to $1,000) if they are doing the labor is much sensible.
And of course the D-Ring is free, the wall/ceiling where it hangs is free, the utilities needed so you can see what is hanging in that D-Ring, the insurance to cover the landlords butt when you fall off the ladder, the water & plumbing so's you can wash out your soiled undies and rinse off the spurting blood from the arterial puncture from that fall... all free. --bill
Current thread:
- Re: NAP Architecture, (continued)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alec H. Peterson (Oct 24)
- Re: NAP Architecture Neil J. McRae (Oct 24)
- Re: NAP Architecture Vijay Gill (Oct 24)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alec H. Peterson (Oct 24)
- Re: NAP Architecture Kent W. England (Oct 28)
- Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture bmanning (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture the Riz (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alec H. Peterson (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Mike Leber (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Bill Manning (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture bmanning (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture bmanning (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture Leigh Porter (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Deepak Jain (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI (Oct 29)