nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAP Architecture
From: Vijay Gill <wrath () cs umbc edu>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 10:12:07 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 24 Oct 1997, Neil J. McRae wrote:
True, but surely there are basics that you would already have researched, btw http://engr.ans.net has some very intersting things on ATM NAP.
Already checked into that. Never hurts to get a wide spectrum of responses. For example, someone pointed out 3com switches, something that had never even crossed my cisco centric thought process. Reasons for asking also include the future path of a relatively untested box (GSR) vs a known factor (GIGAswitch). vijay
Current thread:
- NAP Architecture Vijay Gill (Oct 23)
- Re: NAP Architecture bmanning (Oct 23)
- Re: NAP Architecture Chris A. Icide (Oct 23)
- Re: NAP Architecture Neil J. McRae (Oct 24)
- Re: NAP Architecture Vijay Gill (Oct 24)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alec H. Peterson (Oct 24)
- Re: NAP Architecture Neil J. McRae (Oct 24)
- Re: NAP Architecture Vijay Gill (Oct 24)
- Re: NAP Architecture bmanning (Oct 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: NAP Architecture Kent W. England (Oct 28)
- Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture bmanning (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture the Riz (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alec H. Peterson (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Mike Leber (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Bill Manning (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture bmanning (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI (Oct 29)