nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAP Architecture
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 09:08:14 -0500 (EST)
Why aren't one-off costs enough? There is *no* re-occuring costs with a cable hanging on the ceiling. Point taken on 'what the market will bear', but thats not the discussion here.
Nope. Its not free. And simple one off costs are not enough. The recuring costs are there and anyone who does not pass them on is to be taken advantage of and abused. Of course if you can charge what the market will bear, then your stock price will rise as you can pay out those phat dividends. Customer complaints simply show that they are paying (attention/the usual and customary fees). If they were -really- pissed (drunk/upset) they'd vote w/ their pocketbook and find other accomodations elsewhere. -- --bill
Current thread:
- Re: NAP Architecture, (continued)
- Re: NAP Architecture Kent W. England (Oct 28)
- Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture bmanning (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture the Riz (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alec H. Peterson (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Mike Leber (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Bill Manning (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture bmanning (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture bmanning (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Kent W. England (Oct 28)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture Leigh Porter (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Deepak Jain (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI (Oct 29)
- Message not available
- Re: NAP Architecture Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI (Oct 29)